There have been reports of Google Chrome failing to load in Citrix environments, resulting in a "sad Chrome icon." This is due to a conflict between Chrome’s sandbox security feature and the Citrix virtual environment. Running Chrome with the -no-sandbox command-line switch may fix the issue, but it is not recommended for a production environment. Instead, updating Chrome and Citrix components, configuring group policy objects, and checking third-party software may resolve the issue. It is also recommended to properly handle Chrome’s user profile data using a Citrix Profile Management solution.
Read the entire ‘Troubleshooting Chrome in a Citrix Environment: The "Sad Chrome Icon" Issue Explained’ thread below:
Anyone experiencing an issue with Chrome in a Citrix environment where it fails to load and you get a Sad Chrome icon on the tab? Using the -nosandbox switch works and chrome works, so I am wondering if it is something there. In some cases, if we run chrome in Compatibility Mode, then it will launch with no issue. But this only seems to work on desktops not on XenApp. We can’t be the only ones or at least i hope not!
Is the home page set to a internal/local url?
Gemini response, for what its worth..
Yes, the issue of Chrome failing to load with the "sad Chrome icon" in a Citrix environment and working when launched with the -no-sandbox switch is a known issue.
This behavior points directly to a conflict involving Chrome’s Sandbox security feature and the Citrix virtual environment.
:face_with_monocle: What Causes the "Sad Chrome Icon"?
The sad Chrome icon (or "frowning face") typically appears when a Chrome renderer process crashes or is unexpectedly killed by the system.
In a multi-user environment like Citrix, the conflict is almost always related to the way the Chrome Sandbox interacts with the host operating system’s features or third-party software (like antivirus, DLP, or other Citrix components) that are trying to manage or restrict processes.
• Chrome’s Sandbox: The sandbox is a crucial security layer that isolates renderer processes from the main application and the rest of the operating system. It relies heavily on low-level Windows functions and security tokens to operate correctly.
• Citrix Conflict: The Citrix architecture, especially the Universal Profile Management, policy enforcement, or security software often present on Virtual Delivery Agents (VDAs), can interfere with the sandbox’s attempts to create its isolated process space. This interference causes the sandbox to fail, leading to the renderer process crash and the sad icon.
✅ Why -no-sandbox Fixes It
The -no-sandbox command-line switch tells Chrome to disable its security sandbox completely.
• By disabling the sandbox, you remove the component that is conflicting with the Citrix environment. Chrome can then launch its renderer processes without the restricted security model, allowing it to function.
> ⚠️ Important Security Note: Running Chrome with -no-sandbox in a production environment is strongly discouraged by Google and should be avoided if possible. It significantly lowers the security posture of the browser and the host system, especially on a shared server, making it vulnerable to malicious web content.
🛠️ Recommended Solutions
Instead of permanently using -no-sandbox, the recommended approach is to properly configure the Citrix environment to allow the Chrome sandbox to function.
- Update Chrome and Citrix Components: Ensure both Google Chrome (using the Enterprise Bundle installer) and the Citrix Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA), along with the Citrix Workspace App, are running the latest, fully patched versions. This is the single most common fix, as both companies release patches to address these compatibility issues.
- Use Chrome Group Policy Objects (GPOs): Google provides administrative templates (ADMX) for Chrome. Reviewing and applying relevant GPOs for shared computing environments can often resolve the issue without completely disabling the sandbox.
- Check Third-Party Software: Security tools (like antivirus, HIPS, or application whitelisting) are often the source of the conflict. Configure exceptions for Chrome’s main executable and its renderer processes to allow them to operate freely within the VDA.
- Profile Management: Ensure the user profile data for Chrome (%LocalAppData%\Google\Chrome\User Data) is being handled correctly by your Citrix Profile Management solution (e.g., proper exclusion/inclusion rules for temporary or large files).
@member – It’s set to the default google landing page.
@member – Yeah we did the –nosandbox as a work around but there is a banner that gets displayed when this mode is on. Unfortunately we are not subscribed to Chrome Enterprise. It might be the step we need to make this work. We never had this issue until recently, and then we hear about this agreement between Citrix and Google.. Going to check on recommended with my Citrix engineer and see if we can get any relief with this issue.. thanks !
Continue reading and comment on the thread ‘Troubleshooting Chrome in a Citrix Environment: The “Sad Chrome Icon” Issue Explained’. Not a member? Join Here!
Categories: All Archives
